17
May 10   

News media, women, politics = bias?

Comments Off

Extensive criticism of current affairs broadcasters in this morning’s Guardian media section of how old, male and grey were the vast majority of commentators and interviewees on television along the election trail. Over in The Times, a coincidental counterpoint from Libby Purves on the shortage of female cabinet ministers. Not strictly an argument based on the media’s talking heads, but Libby’s I-don’t-really-care-any-more conclusion could equally well apply to the news media.

Facts only clutter a debate, I know, but if anyone’s interested in whether there’s any basis to the complaint about men taking back the airwaves, my City University colleague Lis Howell has actually had people count them. The results are here and if you have a subscription to Broadcast magazine, you can see an extended analysis by Lis here. The skew towards male voices and faces is so weird that I’m wondering if it’s better explained as simple ignorance and lack of imagination by broadcast producers rather than “gender bias”.


Tags: , , ,

16
May 10   

Bouncing Czechs

Comments Off

Much debate about new business models for journalism patronisingly assumes that all the interesting imagining, innovation and invention is going on in north-western Europe, Scandinavia and America. Not so. To see one of the most interesting experiments of all, you only have to swing the searchlight a short distance eastwards towards central Europe to light up what is going on in the Czech Republic.

I described the hyperlocal news publishing experiment known as Nase Adresa in a lecture (p11 or search “Czech” here). I’m delighted to see that its international ambassador Roman Gallo has been getting out and about with his message: here he’s in Canada.

Note a few significant things about this initiative:

1) It’s one of the very few of its kind which is backed by a big (and presumably hard-headed) company – in this case the Amsterdam-based insurance group PPF.

Continue reading –>


Tags: , ,

13
May 10   

Paywalls (part 93)

Comments Off

So much coverage and discussion of charging for online news sites is coloured by prejudice, emotion and vested interest that it’s worth marking a piece which surveys the scene without any of those disadvantages. Very fair survey in today’s Independent by their media guru Ian Burrell, which captures the shift in thinking that is going on all over news publishing, and not just in News Corporation. Disclosure: I naturally think this piece is worth reading as I’m quoted at the end.


Tags: , ,

12
May 10   

Is there a Nick Robinson fan club?

Comments Off

Is there a Nick Robinson fan club?If so, I need to come out and say that I’ll join. Though this may not be the normal mode for this blog, I need to gush for few seconds about the performance of the BBC’s political editor during the days of uncertainty before the Con-Lib coalition was formed last night.

No television reporter who has to use his judgement will ever perfectly satisfy everyone. I have no sense of whether Robinson’s marathon performance over the past five days is the stuff that wins awards. But it deserves to, and it is worth stopping for a moment to list exactly why he is so good at his job.

Consistency and stamina for a start: he looked and sounded the same throughout – a feat that few of us could manage under those pressures. He is as close to even-handedness as is possible compatible with using his judgement to make sense of what is happening: never lost for words but never waffling, always conscious that his job is not to fill airtime but to add value. That sunny on-screen disposition seems to mask iron self-discipline.

No doubt he makes mistakes, but few get brought up. He avoids Alastair Campbell onscreen and so reduces the risk that Campbell will get under his skin. Here is the Adam Boulton-loses-his-rag scene that occurs if this happens  – and the complaints that follow.

Continue reading –>


Tags: , ,

10
May 10   

Paywalls: close encounter with a nuance

Comments Off

With the start of the charging experiment by The Times and the Sunday Times apparently close at hand, it’s time to go back to “paywalls”.

By way of a warm-up, here is a recent blog post by the FT‘s John Gapper, who thinks he detected a softening of opposition to charging when he listened to Guardian editor Alan Rusbridger recently. And there’s an interesting comment from Tim Brooks, the CEO of Guardian Media Group.


Tags: , , ,

09
May 10   

Subterranean democracy blues

Comments Off

Absolutely superb essay in the New York Review of Books by Mark Lilla on long, deep trends in American democracy and society. One of the best pieces of its kind I’ve read in a long time.  Some of those shifts are particular to the US, but I don’t think they’re entirely irrelevant to other affluent societies. Remember Lilla’s analysis as the mid-term election campaign heats up later this year.


Tags:

07
May 10   

Newsweek RIP?

Comments Off

All you need to know about the background to Newsweek’s decline Newsweek RIP?and likely fall (with links to other commentaries) from Marion Maneker’s Goodnight, Gutenberg blog at Slate.

This debate is known as “It’s not the Economist, stupid.”


Tags: , , ,

06
May 10   

Sense and nonsense about newspapers and elections

Comments Off

I’m getting asked a lot of questions about newspapers and their effects on elections. Any kind of close or surprising result usually unleashes a wave of claims that newspapers have manipulated, influenced or dumbed down coverage. If the past is any guide, most of these theories will be wrong.

I took part in a discussion on Radio 4′s Media Show on this subject yesterday. My City University colleague Roy Greenslade wrote a fine debunking Evening Standard column. Hold on to the following facts as you listen to claims that it was newspapers wot won it or lost it.

  • Evidence that formal endorsements of political parties by papers change votes is hard to come by. People mostly don’t choose their paper because of its political allegiance. Twenty per cent of Daily Mail readers regularly vote Labour. If newspapers ever influence how people think politically, they only do so very gradually. Stop Press: the complexity of this is well caught by a neat new experiment from The Times.
  • A majority of newspaper titles advocate a Tory vote and that’s been the case in the 17 elections since 1945. Labour won nine of those outright.
  • In 1945, when newspapers commanded a vastly greater “mindshare” than now and television broadcasting hadn’t begun, most editors and proprietors campaigned for a Conservative victory. Labour won a landslide.
  • Newspapers now compete in a media market filled with hundreds of broadcast channels and proliferating new media platforms. When The Sun switched allegiance from Labour to the Tories last autumn, one major pollster pointed out that they were following, not leading, their readers who had moved in the same direction earlier in the year.
  • The media event of this election wasn’t the much-hyped new media or print but TV. The leaders debates moved Nick Clegg and the Lib Dems 9-11 points up in the polls and they stayed there. Print does not do this and never has.

Continue reading –>


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,