07
Jun 10   

Rupert’s hymn to Steve Jobs

Comments Off

The low subscription price being asked as of next month for The Times and Sunday Times sets some hard tasks for the papers’ owners in the future: raising the price involves raising the value seen by the subscriber. Or so I thought. Rupert Murdoch sees the working of a paywall quite differently. Cutting people off when they don’t pay may work for cable or satellite TV, but I’m less sure that it’ll work that way for newspaper sites. But what do I know?

One of the weird things about Murdoch’s reputation is that what he actually says – on the relatively rare occasions he’s interviewed – gets little attention. So the interview detail is worth the six minutes. Highlights: the Wall Street Journal should really be called “the Main Street Journal” (a soundbite which bears all the hallmarks of the WSJ’s editor Robert Thomson), publishers should charge for “electronic distribution” (rather than for content, note), namechecks for the Wired and Scientific American sites and gushing, BP-oil-leak-style praise for Steve Jobs.


Tags: , , , , , , ,

06
Jun 10   

Bureau of Investigative Journalism lifts off

Comments Off

The Bureau of Investigative Journalism, Britain’s answer to the American ProPublica and working out of City University, hit the ground running this weekend with the publication of its first story, a joint investigation with the British Medical Journal. The story revealed that a number of scientists who have advised the World Health Organisation on a possible flu pandemic have done paid work for drug firms who stood to benefit from WHO plans to deal with a major outbreak.

Harvey Fineberg, President of the Institute of Medicine in Washington and who chairs the WHO committee which reviews plans for the H1N1 virus, quickly released a statement saying that his commitee would be looking at this question when it next meets.

The story ran early on Al-Jazeera and was picked up quickly by The Guardian and dozens of others. A small milestone in the efforts to rebuild the strength of investigative journalism beyond mainstream new organisations. More scoops to follow. (Declaration: I’m a BIJ trustee.)


Tags: , , , ,

04
Jun 10   

A little Shirky for the weekend

Comments Off

The anarchic variety of web-born information expands faster than we get meta-info to filter and navigate what is bountiful but often bewildering. Taste-making can’t be done by algorithm and so someone has to commit journalism for useful stuff to be created.

The Atlantic Wire has been asking well-primed pundits to download their favourite sources of information, news and wisdom (these categories don’t inavriably overlap). This week they reached Clay Shirky, already something of a guru-hero to this blog. I haven’t looked at an alarmingly-high number of his sources, so I’m going to spend at least part of the weekend (the part when it rains) checking them out.

Shirky, incidentally, has a new book out soon and will be in Britain for two days at the end of June to publicise. Appearance at the LSE details here. Piece based on the book from the Wall St Journal here.


Tags: ,

02
Jun 10   

Really useful list

1 comment

Here’s a link to one of the more useful lists I’ve seen for some time: Michele McLellan’s index of new community online news sites in the US. The Reynolds Journalism Institute in Missouri is the host of a conference on these initiatives. If you follow Jay Rosen’s tweets (@jayrosen_nyu), you’ll have already been pelted with micro-announcements.

I’ve seen attempts at a similar list for the UK but nothing quite this full or systematic. If anybody knows of one, please let me know.


Tags: , ,

01
Jun 10   

BabyBarista slips through the paywall

1 comment

The upcoming paywall at The Times has claimed its first victim as one of its legal bloggers, BabyBarista, departed the paper to set up independently in order not to be cut off from the network of links, contacts and readers which the blog has created. Having waved a fond goodbye, barrister Tim Kevan then pronounced that the paywall will be a “disaster”. That post also contains links to those who agree with him and that list happens to make a very good guided tour of the opinions on one side of the argument.

Note two things. First the glee with which this breach in the wall is being greeted by those who have declared, in advance of the results coming in, that the experiment with paywalls will fail. This is premature in more than one way.

The judgement about The Times wall can’t be made for months. We need to know about revenue, subscriber churn, the kinds of usage the site is getting and whether ads are being sold on the new sites – to name only a few of things we probably won’t get told about. And paywall experiments will differ: if the one at The Times fails, that doesn’t mean that others (e.g. the upcoming one at the New York Times) will crash. Lastly, one defecting blogger doesn’t unravel a whole newspaper.

Second and more important, see how the ground of debate is shifting away from economics towards links. Paywall experiments are about making money from content. But the biggest difficulties they face haven’t been financial; they’ve been creative. Writers like being linked. They want reactions, tips, comments and, above all, recognition. Anything which shrinks those possibilities goes against the grain and against their interests.

Continue reading –>


Tags: , , , , , , ,

27
May 10   

Times teething

1 comment

Missed both the bloggers’ sneak preview and the party to launch the new Times and Sunday Times websites but I would have liked to test drive them today.

I managed to get a glimpse of the new Times look and to read an arts review but every time I went back to the front page, I kept getting asked for my email and password on a popdown. After this had happened four times, I gave up. By next week no doubt these wrinkles will have been ironed out and there will be a live edition of the Sunday Times to look at. I will report back then.

Whatever else may be said, The Times site looks very good: classy, poised and clear. Credit for that goes to the Head of Design Jon Hill (his comment on this post namechecks his team).


Tags: , ,

26
May 10   

Life expectancy of newspapers: and the answer is…

Comments Off

On a recent radio debate, Sunday Times editor John Witherow and Guardian editor Alan Rusbridger both said that the latest printing press purchases by their companies were likely to be their last – thus putting a rough outer limit on the number of years they think their titles will be in print. Thirty years and twenty respectively.

A senior honcho at Pearson, owners of the FT, shortened this to (maybe) five years at a seminar this week. Er, not quite, said a different suit at the FT, rowing back some way. Rob Andrews of PaidContent has very helpfully rounded up here this new readiness to schedule the death of print in more detail then ever before.

Or, as Jeff Jarvis tweeted today: “They said I was nuts when I saw an end to print. I’m getting more company in the asylum.”


Tags: , , , , , , ,

24
May 10   

The next big thing, quite huge in fact

Comments Off

Wonderful news! A subject big and important enough to drown the stream of posts and tweets on the theme of do-I-or-don’t-I love the iPad.

Data.

I can’t claim to have worked out all the implications for journalists (let alone for the world) and that’s because I haven’t kept up with the rapidly growing literature. Shameful ignorance, but I’m working on it. Mainly by starting with this useful entry-level primer from the Guardian Datablog. More soon.


Tags: ,