<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Murdoch, MailOnline and other accelerating disruptions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://georgebrock.net/murdoch-mailonline-and-the-rapidly-evolving-bigger-picture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://georgebrock.net/murdoch-mailonline-and-the-rapidly-evolving-bigger-picture/</link>
	<description>21st Century Media and Journalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 May 2013 00:13:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake O'Neill</title>
		<link>http://georgebrock.net/murdoch-mailonline-and-the-rapidly-evolving-bigger-picture/comment-page-1/#comment-5851</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake O'Neill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2012 09:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://georgebrock.net/?p=2583#comment-5851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the &#039;digital first&#039; to &#039;digital only&#039; trend is just the beginning. Print publications are now looking at alternatives as online ad revenues just aren&#039;t enough (Look how long it took the Mail Online to reach profit and at the numbers it needed). 

The trend for free publications, Time Out et al. may grow but surely there will eventually be a divide between what can still work in print and what doesn&#039;t need print in the digital age?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the &#8216;digital first&#8217; to &#8216;digital only&#8217; trend is just the beginning. Print publications are now looking at alternatives as online ad revenues just aren&#8217;t enough (Look how long it took the Mail Online to reach profit and at the numbers it needed). </p>
<p>The trend for free publications, Time Out et al. may grow but surely there will eventually be a divide between what can still work in print and what doesn&#8217;t need print in the digital age?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sybil Nolan</title>
		<link>http://georgebrock.net/murdoch-mailonline-and-the-rapidly-evolving-bigger-picture/comment-page-1/#comment-5814</link>
		<dc:creator>Sybil Nolan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2012 13:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://georgebrock.net/?p=2583#comment-5814</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Misha, your view re online advertising may be correct. I am simply pointing out that what George said will probably leave many readers not familiar with the Age or its history with the impression that the Age&#039;s journalists have only relatively recently turned their hand to quality journalism online. Not so!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Misha, your view re online advertising may be correct. I am simply pointing out that what George said will probably leave many readers not familiar with the Age or its history with the impression that the Age&#8217;s journalists have only relatively recently turned their hand to quality journalism online. Not so!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Lord</title>
		<link>http://georgebrock.net/murdoch-mailonline-and-the-rapidly-evolving-bigger-picture/comment-page-1/#comment-5813</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Lord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 12:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://georgebrock.net/?p=2583#comment-5813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also worth noting that Fairfax media&#039;s online success in Australia is largely driven by Murdoch dominating 70% of print newspapers (plus TV etc). Govt ABC has been largely gutted and neutered. So intelligent readers have little other choice for local content. Here on Queenland&#039;s Gold Coast I cannot buy a local, state or national newspaper that is not owned by Murdoch. Even the free weekly in my letterbox is Rupert&#039;s!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also worth noting that Fairfax media&#8217;s online success in Australia is largely driven by Murdoch dominating 70% of print newspapers (plus TV etc). Govt ABC has been largely gutted and neutered. So intelligent readers have little other choice for local content. Here on Queenland&#8217;s Gold Coast I cannot buy a local, state or national newspaper that is not owned by Murdoch. Even the free weekly in my letterbox is Rupert&#8217;s!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Misha Ketchell</title>
		<link>http://georgebrock.net/murdoch-mailonline-and-the-rapidly-evolving-bigger-picture/comment-page-1/#comment-5812</link>
		<dc:creator>Misha Ketchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 11:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://georgebrock.net/?p=2583#comment-5812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sybil, I still thin the Age came to digital late. It took a long time to realise the threat to its advertising business. It failed to buy online businesses in real estate, cars, jobs etc and failed to translate its classified revenue into online revenue. And the editor of The Age never had control of digital. Having a website doesn&#039;t mean you&#039;ve come to digital. I worked there from 1999 to 2004 and no one really got digital then.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sybil, I still thin the Age came to digital late. It took a long time to realise the threat to its advertising business. It failed to buy online businesses in real estate, cars, jobs etc and failed to translate its classified revenue into online revenue. And the editor of The Age never had control of digital. Having a website doesn&#8217;t mean you&#8217;ve come to digital. I worked there from 1999 to 2004 and no one really got digital then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sybil Nolan</title>
		<link>http://georgebrock.net/murdoch-mailonline-and-the-rapidly-evolving-bigger-picture/comment-page-1/#comment-5811</link>
		<dc:creator>Sybil Nolan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 10:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://georgebrock.net/?p=2583#comment-5811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Insightful article, but not at all correct that Melbourne Age came to digital late! The Age&#039;s website was one of the first. Experimentation began in the mid 90s with plain text, and the Age Online followed a couple of years later. Within a few years, there was intense contest between online and newsroom editors at the Age over which of them should be allowed to publish exclusives first.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Insightful article, but not at all correct that Melbourne Age came to digital late! The Age&#8217;s website was one of the first. Experimentation began in the mid 90s with plain text, and the Age Online followed a couple of years later. Within a few years, there was intense contest between online and newsroom editors at the Age over which of them should be allowed to publish exclusives first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
